Html.editorfor templates

Notice that this is actually an anonymous object inside an anonymous object. Remember that the actual parameter is for additional view data, so what this does is essentially add the key ViewData["htmlAttributes"] with the value set to the anonymous object that contains the class you want set. EditorFor , now, looks for this key and will add the appropriate HTML attributes in its default templates. To complicate things even further, though, if you do need to create a custom editor template, you're still completely on your own.

This little workaround only applies to the default templates. Once you start to customize things, then you have full control over the rendered output. Full control means that unless you make something happen, it doesn't happen.

However, you can simulate the same functionality via:. Again, all we're doing is pulling out the value from ViewData and using that to set the value for htmlAttributes. However, what if you want to have some default HTML attributes and also allow passing in additional or even replacement attributes?

Take the following editor template as an example:. EditorForModel Same as EditorFor but focuses on the model itself and does not accept any parameters for individual elements for a model. EditorForModel Html. Thanks, Jatin. User posted What is the Html. EditorFor method? Simple EditorFor example The following example is a simple implementation of the Html. User posted Hi vinodkpasi, Thanks for your post.

As far as I know, EditorForModel. Wednesday, November 6, AM. By Nick Harrison. Users expect Web apps to be fast, engaging and work on every device from smartphones to the widest-screen desktops. Beyond that, they need to be secure, visually engaging and do something useful.

Some have proven to be helpful, others not so much. But they all implement the design pattern differently, adding new features or solving recurring problems in their own ways.

Each framework takes a different approach toward the design pattern, with a unique syntax for templates and introducing custom concepts like factories, modules and observables. The result is a sharp learning curve that can frustrate developers trying to stay current as new frameworks go in and out of vogue. Anything we can do to ease the learning curve is a good thing.

The common approach is to build static HTML pages or fragments and serve them up to the client with minimal server-side processing. As Figure 1 shows, there are minimal requirements for the Web Server and a full-fledged server for the Web API, and both servers need to be accessible from outside the firewall.

Figure 1 Typical Application Layout. NET has a lot more to offer and its implementation of MVC provides many features that are still relevant, even when one of the client-side frameworks does much of the heavy lifting. With just a couple of tweaks, the generated markup is easily customized to fit the template expectations for whatever framework is used on the client. If you make calls back to the server to provide templates for your application, you can now use Razor to do the heavy lifting generating the HTML.

EditorTemplates and DisplayTemplates are still your friends, as are scaffolding templates. You can still inject partial views, and the fluid flow of the Razor syntax is still there to use to your advantage. Beyond the views you can also use the MVC controller, which can add processing power to speed things up or add an extra layer of security.

As Figure 2 shows, not much changes from the typical layout. In general, the flow will look like:. Figure 2 Simple Flow Adding in Razor. This workflow repeats as needed when a new template is requested.

While I will show examples generating views suitable for binding in Angular and Knockout, keep in mind that these are hardly the only options.

From a setup perspective, you need at least three projects. The initial project will be structured as shown in Figure 3. Figure 3 Initial Project Structure.

For this article, it simplifies matters to have two MVC projects, one for each of the frameworks to be demonstrated. I can't get it to display different views for the different types. Is there a way to disambiguate this? Maybe there's more than I know about the naming convention for the. Improve this question. Cristian Diaconescu Cristian Diaconescu Add a comment. Active Oldest Votes. Prop1, "First" Html. Prop2, "Second" However, I would recommend avoiding reusing the same type name in the same project, even if they have different namespaces.

Improve this answer. I agree with your recommendation of not using the same type name, but it's not possible in this case - this is generated code and I can't control what type names are generated.

Name; It's seems that the development team is aware that this simplified approach fieldType. Property AttributeTargets. Field AttributeTargets.

Like this, Html. Bilal Fazlani Bilal Fazlani 6, 6 6 gold badges 39 39 silver badges 78 78 bronze badges.